Case Name: Hitender Shokeen v. Rajan Kumar Shokeen:
2023 SCC OnLine Del 2774
Bench: Justice Jyoti Singh
Facts:
Issues:
Arguments:
Defendant: Suit is time-barred; prior decrees were not challenged; plaintiff is bound by mother’s admissions; no claim for possession.
Plaintiff: Properties are ancestral; fraud alleged in decrees obtained 1972; fraud vitiates decrees; limitation and fraud require trial.
Holding:
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition, affirming the Trial Court’s refusal to reject the plaint. The Court held:
Key Precedents referred:
A.V. Papayya Sastry v. Govt. of A.P., (2007) 4 SCC 221
Nusli Neville Wadia v. Ivory Properties, (2020) 6 SCC 557
Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra, (2003) 1 SCC 557
Significance:
This judgment reinforces that Order VII Rule 11 CPC should be sparingly invoked, especially in cases involving fraud, ancestral property rights, and limitation issues requiring trial. It upholds a party’s right to contest decrees allegedly obtained through fraud and collusion, even if belated.